Fix a bug in the type propagation phase of optimizing.

The compiler was placing phis (and their floating point equivalent),
in a way that it did not expect.

Change-Id: I974be1ee4aae5d27d68c6bba171db0ed25377b70
diff --git a/compiler/optimizing/ssa_builder.cc b/compiler/optimizing/ssa_builder.cc
index fec40f9..b2cc119 100644
--- a/compiler/optimizing/ssa_builder.cc
+++ b/compiler/optimizing/ssa_builder.cc
@@ -183,8 +183,7 @@
 static HPhi* GetFloatOrDoubleEquivalentOfPhi(HPhi* phi, Primitive::Type type) {
   // We place the floating point phi next to this phi.
   HInstruction* next = phi->GetNext();
-  if (next == nullptr
-      || (next->GetType() != Primitive::kPrimDouble && next->GetType() != Primitive::kPrimFloat)) {
+  if (next == nullptr || (next->AsPhi()->GetRegNumber() != phi->GetRegNumber())) {
     ArenaAllocator* allocator = phi->GetBlock()->GetGraph()->GetArena();
     HPhi* new_phi = new (allocator) HPhi(allocator, phi->GetRegNumber(), phi->InputCount(), type);
     for (size_t i = 0, e = phi->InputCount(); i < e; ++i) {
@@ -195,9 +194,7 @@
     phi->GetBlock()->InsertPhiAfter(new_phi, phi);
     return new_phi;
   } else {
-    // If there is already a phi with the expected type, we know it is the floating
-    // point equivalent of this phi.
-    DCHECK_EQ(next->AsPhi()->GetRegNumber(), phi->GetRegNumber());
+    DCHECK_EQ(next->GetType(), type);
     return next->AsPhi();
   }
 }
diff --git a/compiler/optimizing/ssa_type_propagation.cc b/compiler/optimizing/ssa_type_propagation.cc
index 3828142..cb5ce20 100644
--- a/compiler/optimizing/ssa_type_propagation.cc
+++ b/compiler/optimizing/ssa_type_propagation.cc
@@ -90,10 +90,12 @@
     }
   } else {
     for (HInstructionIterator it(block->GetPhis()); !it.Done(); it.Advance()) {
-      HPhi* phi = it.Current()->AsPhi();
-      if (UpdateType(phi)) {
-        AddDependentInstructionsToWorklist(phi);
-      }
+      // Eagerly compute the type of the phi, for quicker convergence. Note
+      // that we don't need to add users to the worklist because we are
+      // doing a reverse post-order visit, therefore either the phi users are
+      // non-loop phi and will be visited later in the visit, or are loop-phis,
+      // and they are already in the work list.
+      UpdateType(it.Current()->AsPhi());
     }
   }
 }