New instruction simplifications. Extra dce pass. Allow more per block repeats.
Rationale:
We were missing some obvious simplifications, which left performance
at the table for e.g. CaffeineLogic compiled with dx (4200us->2700us).
The constant for allowing a repeat on a BB seemed very low, at the
very least it should depend on the BB size.
Test: test-art-host
Change-Id: Ic234566e117593e12c936d556222e4cd4f928105
diff --git a/test/485-checker-dce-switch/src/Main.java b/test/485-checker-dce-switch/src/Main.java
index 7d5fd4f..95b1a93 100644
--- a/test/485-checker-dce-switch/src/Main.java
+++ b/test/485-checker-dce-switch/src/Main.java
@@ -20,14 +20,14 @@
return 5;
}
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$final (before)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: PackedSwitch
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const100:i\d+>> IntConstant 100
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Const100>>]
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.wholeSwitchDead(int) dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: PackedSwitch
public static int wholeSwitchDead(int j) {
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@
return l;
}
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$final (before)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: PackedSwitch
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const7:i\d+>> IntConstant 7
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Const7>>]
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_InRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: PackedSwitch
public static int constantSwitch_InRange() {
@@ -96,14 +96,14 @@
return i;
}
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$final (before)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: PackedSwitch
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<Const15:i\d+>> IntConstant 15
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<Const15>>]
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_AboveRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: PackedSwitch
public static int constantSwitch_AboveRange() {
@@ -132,14 +132,14 @@
return i;
}
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$final (before)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (before)
/// CHECK-DAG: PackedSwitch
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-DAG: <<ConstM5:i\d+>> IntConstant -5
/// CHECK-DAG: Return [<<ConstM5>>]
- /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$final (after)
+ /// CHECK-START: int Main.constantSwitch_BelowRange() dead_code_elimination$after_inlining (after)
/// CHECK-NOT: PackedSwitch
public static int constantSwitch_BelowRange() {