Quick: Fix optimizations for empty if blocks.
If a block ending with if-eqz or if-nez has the same "taken"
and "fallthrough", we cannot assume that the value has been
checked against zero in one of the succesors. This affects
the null check elimination pass as well as GVN. Refactor all
those checks to a single function in BasicBlock and check
that the "taken" and "falthrough" are different when needed.
Bug: 21614284
Change-Id: I8c6ac23e96cdaf5984786a555ebbd28110f095cb
diff --git a/compiler/dex/mir_graph.h b/compiler/dex/mir_graph.h
index f038397..dbe9062 100644
--- a/compiler/dex/mir_graph.h
+++ b/compiler/dex/mir_graph.h
@@ -452,6 +452,21 @@
MIR* GetFirstNonPhiInsn();
/**
+ * @brief Checks whether the block ends with if-nez or if-eqz that branches to
+ * the given successor only if the register in not zero.
+ */
+ bool BranchesToSuccessorOnlyIfNotZero(BasicBlockId succ_id) const {
+ if (last_mir_insn == nullptr) {
+ return false;
+ }
+ Instruction::Code last_opcode = last_mir_insn->dalvikInsn.opcode;
+ return ((last_opcode == Instruction::IF_EQZ && fall_through == succ_id) ||
+ (last_opcode == Instruction::IF_NEZ && taken == succ_id)) &&
+ // Make sure the other successor isn't the same (empty if), b/21614284.
+ (fall_through != taken);
+ }
+
+ /**
* @brief Used to obtain the next MIR that follows unconditionally.
* @details The implementation does not guarantee that a MIR does not
* follow even if this method returns nullptr.