adjust for newly added bpf map/prog definition fields in T+
This is needed due to BpfLoader v0.18 supporting more
functionality and thus bpf code compilation by default using
larger structs than it did during S.
Bug: 218408035
Test: booted on cuttlefish, atest CtsNativeNetTestCases
OBSigned-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Change-Id: I0a37e59760fb0b55e6d6a6d12d5fd40106accd55
(cherry picked from commit b95db2808073beae71d41e07e2e1c3e6581c7d65)
Merged-In: I0a37e59760fb0b55e6d6a6d12d5fd40106accd55
diff --git a/tests/cts/net/native/src/BpfCompatTest.cpp b/tests/cts/net/native/src/BpfCompatTest.cpp
index 97ecb9e..e52533b 100644
--- a/tests/cts/net/native/src/BpfCompatTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/cts/net/native/src/BpfCompatTest.cpp
@@ -31,8 +31,13 @@
std::ifstream elfFile(elfPath, std::ios::in | std::ios::binary);
ASSERT_TRUE(elfFile.is_open());
- EXPECT_EQ(48, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
- EXPECT_EQ(28, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
+ if (android::modules::sdklevel::IsAtLeastT()) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(116, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(92, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(48, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_map_def", elfFile, 0));
+ EXPECT_EQ(28, readSectionUint("size_of_bpf_prog_def", elfFile, 0));
+ }
}
TEST(BpfTest, bpfStructSizeTestPreT) {