Update FWB patches
Change-Id: Id971fbf815a2fe3a2e97dd09c042775a594fbc16
diff --git a/patches/platform_frameworks_base/0013-Change-SignalStrentgh-to-change-behaviour-based-on-p.patch b/patches/platform_frameworks_base/0013-Change-SignalStrentgh-to-change-behaviour-based-on-p.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c9f3e4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/patches/platform_frameworks_base/0013-Change-SignalStrentgh-to-change-behaviour-based-on-p.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+From bc7bbdb07645f4ab45ce18424c43d9aa066c6fba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Pierre-Hugues Husson <phh@phh.me>
+Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 20:01:44 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 13/14] Change SignalStrentgh to change behaviour based on
+ property
+
+Change-Id: I9e8bec3dd41ecc983e007f6d00157170ac0a3e28
+---
+ .../android/telephony/SignalStrength.java | 39 +++++++++++++------
+ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/telephony/java/android/telephony/SignalStrength.java b/telephony/java/android/telephony/SignalStrength.java
+index 4e5639683a7..ff906d330d4 100644
+--- a/telephony/java/android/telephony/SignalStrength.java
++++ b/telephony/java/android/telephony/SignalStrength.java
+@@ -854,6 +854,7 @@ public class SignalStrength implements Parcelable {
+ * RSRQ = quality of signal dB = Number of Resource blocks*RSRP/RSSI
+ * SNR = gain = signal/noise ratio = -10log P1/P2 dB
+ */
++ String method = android.os.SystemProperties.get("persist.sys.signal.level", "default");
+ int rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN, rsrpIconLevel = -1, snrIconLevel = -1;
+
+ if (mLteRsrp > MAX_LTE_RSRP || mLteRsrp < MIN_LTE_RSRP) {
+@@ -897,6 +898,32 @@ public class SignalStrength implements Parcelable {
+ + rsrpIconLevel + " snrIconLevel:" + snrIconLevel
+ + " lteRsrpBoost:" + mLteRsrpBoost);
+
++ /* Valid values are (0-63, 99) as defined in TS 36.331 */
++ // TODO the range here is probably supposed to be (0..31, 99). It's unclear if anyone relies
++ // on the current incorrect range check, so this will be fixed in a future release with more
++ // soak time
++ if (mLteSignalStrength > 63) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
++ else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 12) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GREAT;
++ else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 8) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GOOD;
++ else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 5) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_MODERATE;
++ else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 0) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_POOR;
++
++ if (DBG) log("getLTELevel - rssi:" + mLteSignalStrength + " rssiIconLevel:"
++ + rssiIconLevel);
++
++ if("rsrp".equals(method)) {
++ if(rsrpIconLevel == -1) rsrpIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
++ return rsrpIconLevel;
++ }
++ if("rssnr".equals(method)) {
++ if(snrIconLevel == -1) snrIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
++ return snrIconLevel;
++ }
++ if("rssi".equals(method)) {
++ if(rssiIconLevel == -1) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
++ return rssiIconLevel;
++ }
++
+ /* Choose a measurement type to use for notification */
+ if (snrIconLevel != -1 && rsrpIconLevel != -1) {
+ /*
+@@ -911,18 +938,6 @@ public class SignalStrength implements Parcelable {
+
+ if (rsrpIconLevel != -1) return rsrpIconLevel;
+
+- /* Valid values are (0-63, 99) as defined in TS 36.331 */
+- // TODO the range here is probably supposed to be (0..31, 99). It's unclear if anyone relies
+- // on the current incorrect range check, so this will be fixed in a future release with more
+- // soak time
+- if (mLteSignalStrength > 63) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_NONE_OR_UNKNOWN;
+- else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 12) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GREAT;
+- else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 8) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_GOOD;
+- else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 5) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_MODERATE;
+- else if (mLteSignalStrength >= 0) rssiIconLevel = SIGNAL_STRENGTH_POOR;
+-
+- if (DBG) log("getLteLevel - rssi:" + mLteSignalStrength + " rssiIconLevel:"
+- + rssiIconLevel);
+ return rssiIconLevel;
+
+ }
+--
+2.17.1
+